Dealing With Change: Using the Conditional Change Model for Clinical Research


 

Mikel Aickin, PhD

Spring 2009 - Volume 13 Number 2

https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/08-070

Introduction

Virtually all clinical medicine is about change. The criteria for deciding whether a therapy has been successful nearly always include consideration of the degree to which the patient’s initial condition has improved or to which a deteriorating condition has been stabilized. Both criteria depend on change. In the first case it is a rise in some measurement of benefit or drop in some measurement of burden, whereas in the second it is that a downward change has been prevented.

In clinical research, therefore, one of the most frequently used approaches is to compare changes in a treated group with corresponding changes in a control group. Perhaps the most notable pedagogic failing of statistics courses and textbooks is that they do not present the appropriate way to analyze data coming from this design, which explains why published analyses are so often suboptimal, if not actually incorrect. The purposes of this article are to explain what should be the default method of analyzing change data and to indicate how to compute and display the results graphically.

Reprint Permissions

The Permanente Journal welcomes requests for reprints and reproduction. Use of any and all published materials is copyrighted and protected.

SUBSCRIPTION

Journal subscriptions for The Permanente Journal are entered for the calendar year. Advance payment in US dollars is required.

CIRCULATION

27,000 print readers per quarter, 15,350 eTOC readers, and in 2018, 2 million page views of TPJ articles in PubMed from a broad international readership.

Indexing

Indexed in MEDLINE, PubMed Central, HINARI, EMBASE, EBSCO Academic Search Complete, rdrb, CrossRef, and SciVerse/Scopus.


                                             

 

 

ISSN 1552-5767 Copyright © 2019 thepermanentejournal.org.

All Rights Reserved.