Supportive Care for Complex Needs—Kaiser Permanente Care Team Management Models

Supportive Care for Complex Needs—Kaiser Permanente Care Team Management Models

 

Tracy Ellen Lippard, MD; Stacey Moret, MOT, OTR/L;
Michelle Wong, MPH, MPP

https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/17-140-07

Introduction: Responding to the needs of patients with complex needs is currently inadequate. Patients with complex needs suffer from medical comorbidities, functional limitations, and unmet social needs.
Methods: Kaiser Permanente (KP) Colorado’s Primary Care Plus (PC+) followed a strict eligibility criteria to capture high-need, high-cost members older than age 65 years (or age 18-64 years on Medicare). The evaluation design was a prospective matched control study assessing cost and utilization of members from a single clinic at 12 months of enrollment. KP Northwest’s (KPNW’s) Team-Based Care (TBC) evaluation design was a retrospective matched control study that compared members 12 months pre-enrollment and 23 months postenrollment. A secondary assessment sampled members enrolled in TBC for 12 months between summer 2014 and summer 2015.
Results: In Colorado, office visit costs were 21% higher among PC+ participants compared with the control group; however this cost was more than offset by inpatient costs that were 75% lower among participants. In contrast to PC+, KPNW’s TBC did not show a significant difference in cost and utilization (ie, operating cost per patient per month, admits per 1000 patients, average length of stay, inpatient cost per patient per month, Emergency Department [ED] visits per 1000, and ED visits per member).
Discussion: Early assessment evaluations of both programs reported high satisfaction among clinicians, staff, members, and caregivers. In addition, among the initial group of PC+ program participants, 104 members had 21 important pharmacy interventions (ie, alendronate starts) within the first 6 months of enrollment compared with zero in the matched control group of 108 patients. The PC+ intervention group also saw an increase of specialty palliative care/hospice touches from 8% to 55%.
Conclusion: Initial findings from PC+ and TBC indicate that holistic, interdisciplinary focus on what matters most to high-cost, high-need members and their caregivers, with proactive outreaches and improved access to someone who knows them well, can yield benefits across the quadruple aim.

Circulation

27,000 print readers per quarter, 11,225 eTOC readers, and in 2017, 1.5 million page views on TPJ articles in PubMed from a broad international readership.

The Permanente Journal

The Permanente Journal is a peer-reviewed journal of medical science, social science in medicine, and medical humanities published quarterly by The Permanente Press.

E-TOC

Click here to join the E-TOC list or text ETOC to 22828. You will receive an e-mail notice with the Table of Contents of each issue.


ISSN 1552-5775 Copyright © 2018 thepermanentejournal.org.

The Permanente Press. All Rights Reserved.