Supportive Care for Complex Needs—Kaiser Permanente Care Team Management Models

Supportive Care for Complex Needs—Kaiser Permanente Care Team Management Models

 

Tracy Ellen Lippard, MD; Stacey Moret, MOT, OTR/L;
Michelle Wong, MPH, MPP

https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/17-140-07

Introduction: Responding to the needs of patients with complex needs is currently inadequate. Patients with complex needs suffer from medical comorbidities, functional limitations, and unmet social needs.
Methods: Kaiser Permanente (KP) Colorado’s Primary Care Plus (PC+) followed a strict eligibility criteria to capture high-need, high-cost members older than age 65 years (or age 18-64 years on Medicare). The evaluation design was a prospective matched control study assessing cost and utilization of members from a single clinic at 12 months of enrollment. KP Northwest’s (KPNW’s) Team-Based Care (TBC) evaluation design was a retrospective matched control study that compared members 12 months pre-enrollment and 23 months postenrollment. A secondary assessment sampled members enrolled in TBC for 12 months between summer 2014 and summer 2015.
Results: In Colorado, office visit costs were 21% higher among PC+ participants compared with the control group; however this cost was more than offset by inpatient costs that were 75% lower among participants. In contrast to PC+, KPNW’s TBC did not show a significant difference in cost and utilization (ie, operating cost per patient per month, admits per 1000 patients, average length of stay, inpatient cost per patient per month, Emergency Department [ED] visits per 1000, and ED visits per member).
Discussion: Early assessment evaluations of both programs reported high satisfaction among clinicians, staff, members, and caregivers. In addition, among the initial group of PC+ program participants, 104 members had 21 important pharmacy interventions (ie, alendronate starts) within the first 6 months of enrollment compared with zero in the matched control group of 108 patients. The PC+ intervention group also saw an increase of specialty palliative care/hospice touches from 8% to 55%.
Conclusion: Initial findings from PC+ and TBC indicate that holistic, interdisciplinary focus on what matters most to high-cost, high-need members and their caregivers, with proactive outreaches and improved access to someone who knows them well, can yield benefits across the quadruple aim.

etoc emailClick here to join the eTOC list or text TPJ to 22828. You will receive an Email notice with the Table of Contents of each issue.

The Permanente Journal advances knowledge in scientific research, clinical medicine and innovative health care delivery. It is a peer-reviewed journal of medical science, social science in medicine, and medical humanities.

The Permanente Press

The Permanente Press publishes The Permanente Journal and books related to health care. For information about subscriptions, missing issues, billing, subscription renewal, and back issues, Email: permanente.journal@kp.org.

Circulation

27,000 print readers per quarter, 15,350 eTOC readers, and in 2018, 2 million page views of TPJ articles in PubMed from a broad international readership.

CME

The Kaiser Permanente National CME Program designates this journal-based CME activity for 4 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.


ISSN 1552-5767 Copyright © 2019 thepermanentejournal.org.

All Rights Reserved.