Quality Over Quantity: Integrating Mental Health Assessment Tools into Primary Care Practice

Quality Over Quantity: Integrating Mental Health Assessment Tools into Primary Care Practice

 

Darrell L Hudson, PhD, MPH

Perm J 2016 Summer;20(3):15-148

https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/15-148
E-pub: 06/17/2016

ABSTRACT

Depression is one of the most common, costly, and debilitating psychiatric disorders in the US. There are also strong associations between depression and physical health outcomes, particularly chronic diseases such as diabetes mellitus. Yet, mental health services are underutilized throughout the US. Recent policy changes have encouraged depression screening in primary care settings. However, there is not much guidance about how depression screeners are administered. There are people suffering from depression who are not getting the treatment they need. It is important to consider whether enough care is being taken when administering depression screeners in primary care settings.

INTRODUCTION

I was at the doctor’s office, a family medicine practice for a routine check-up.

“I have to ask you these questions about mental health,” the nurse said sheepishly after recording my heart rate and blood pressure.

The preface immediately put me on guard and I tensed up. On the one hand, I thought, does anyone suspect that something is wrong with me? Could they tell I was anxious because I forgot to get cash and would have to dive for quarters in my glove box to get out of their parking deck? On the other hand, I conduct mental health research, so I knew the nurse was probably going to ask me questions from the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ). I was encouraged that mental health was being integrated into a medical visit in a primary care setting.

During the past two weeks, have you found little interest or pleasure in doing things?

Have you felt down, depressed, or hopeless?

The answer to both of these questions was no. But the opening statement from the nurse about her obligation to ask questions about mental health set me on edge a bit. The nurse’s demeanor changed from when she was taking my blood pressure and recording my weight. In one sentence, she made it abundantly clear that she was asking only because of obligation, she was not comfortable asking, and she was not particularly interested in hearing my answers to the questions. I wondered, if I was feeling down or losing interest in doing things I had previously enjoyed, would I feel comfortable telling her? Considering her apparent disinterest, did she even care? Would I believe that she would do anything about my feelings?

Depression is one of the most common, costly, and debilitating conditions in the US, affecting millions of Americans each year.1-5 Disability from depression is associated with lower educational attainment and income earned as well as increased days off work.6-10 Depression is also associated with suicide11-13 in addition to a wide range of chronic diseases such as heart disease and diabetes mellitus.14-18 Recent national policy changes related to mental health coverage, namely the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 201019 and the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act,20 have promoted the integration of mental health screening and treatment into primary care settings. Indeed, most patients are initially diagnosed and treated for mental health problems within primary care settings.21,22 Many practices and health care systems, such as Kaiser Permanente, use the PHQ to screen for mental health problems. Results from numerous studies indicate that this measure is effective in screening for mental health problems in primary care settings; even versions with fewer items do a good job of identifying depression.23-25

Although there are numerous resources that describe different versions of the PHQ as well as information about reliability and validity, in addition to steps on how to score the screener, there are no clear guidelines about how clinicians should go about asking patients questions about their mental health. However, the manner in which questions are asked and by whom have a profound effect on the answers that patients provide.26,27 This is especially true when asking about sensitive information.27 Race/ethnicity, sex, social class, and sexual orientation are additional considerations that mental health service clinicians must contend with and which make recognition and treatment of depression even more challenging. Further, mental health conditions remain highly stigmatized. This seems to be an important factor that should be addressed at the individual clinician level as well as at the system level.

Practices and health care plans should be applauded for taking steps to integrate mental health and primary care. Despite the efficacy and effectiveness of the PHQ, I wondered how probable someone suffering from depression would be to share such feelings during a similar clinical interaction. I wondered if the nurse’s preface and, more importantly, her demeanor would affect the comfort of patients who do suffer from mental health problems and give them pause about answering the questions honestly.

Is it enough to simply ask questions, especially if the person asking the question does not seem the least bit interested or enthused about doing so? If the goal is to screen patients who may be suffering from depression and other mental health problems, there must be better care in the administration of the PHQ within primary care settings. If patients are anxious about their answers or fear judgment, they might give biased answers. And that will not help anyone. If the nurse’s preface to the questions put me on guard, I wondered how other primary care patients might feel.

A search of the literature for best practices in administering the PHQ or other depression screeners did not produce any specific guidelines to help clinicians to most effectively administer these instruments. However, clinicians could help to mitigate stigma by establishing rapport and asking about patients’ overall well-being, whether they are feeling very stressed, and whether there have been any substantial changes in their lives. It may also help to have physicians incorporate these questions into their general physical examination so that patients understand that mental health is essential to overall well-being. Furthermore, there should be clinician continuity in who administers depression screeners. In my case, a nurse with whom I do not recall interacting before my visit administered the PHQ before I saw my regular physician. I did not have a relationship with her and would have found the screener questions less obtrusive if they were incorporated into time with the physician, whom I have been seeing for several years. The PHQ and other depression screeners avoid psychiatric terms that may be stigmatized or confusing to patients. Similarly, clinicians should avoid these terms. Additionally, once clinicians ask questions about mental health, they must be prepared to discuss the challenges that patients are facing and be ready to provide referrals and resources to help patients with mental health conditions.

There are probably many missed opportunities to address the mental health needs of Americans. It is no secret that mental health services are underutilized in the US.28-30 Fewer than half of the people who have a mental health problem ever seek services.31 Even in highly vulnerable populations, like those who have diabetes, depression recognition (eg, diagnosis, medication, referral to mental health specialty care) can be poor.32 It is probable that there are patients suffering from mental health problems who do not seek treatment or who are not being recognized with these problems when they interact with clinicians for medical concerns. It is important to consider whether enough care is being taken when administering depression screeners in primary care settings. Furthermore, it may be important to alert patients that they should expect to be screened for mental health issues even if they are visiting for their physical examinations.

Disclosure Statement

This work was supported by the Barnes-Jewish Hospital Foundation in addition to Grant Number 1P30DK092950 from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, and its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. The funding agreement ensured the authors’ independence in designing the study, collecting and interpreting the data, writing, and publishing the results.
The author(s) have no other conflicts of interest to disclose.

Acknowledgments

Mary Corrado, ELS, provided editorial assistance.

How to Cite this Article

Hudson DL. Quality over quantity: integrating mental health assessment tools into primary care practice. Perm J 2016 Summer;20(3):15-148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/15-148

References
1.    Greenberg PE, Kessler RC, Birnbaum HG, et al. The economic burden of depression in the United States: how did it change between 1990 and 2000? J Clin Psychiatry 2003 Dec;64(12):1465-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.v64n1211.
    2.    Demyttenaere K, Bruffaerts R, Posada-Villa J, et al; WHO World Mental Health Survey Consortium. Prevalence, severity, and unmet need for treatment of mental disorders
in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys. JAMA 2004 Jun 2;
291(21):2581-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.21.2581.
    3.    Kessler RC, Chiu WT, Demler O, Merikangas KR, Walters EE. Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005 Jun;62(6):617-27. DOI: https://doi.org/
10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.617.
    4.    Ustün TB, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Chatterji S, Mathers C, Murray CJ. Global burden of depressive disorders in the year 2000. Br J Psychiatry 2004 May;184(5):386-92.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.184.5.386.
    5.    Gwynn RC, McQuistion HL, McVeigh KH, Garg RK, Frieden TR, Thorpe LE. Prevalence, diagnosis, and treatment of depression and generalized anxiety
disorder in a diverse urban community. Psychiatr Serv 2008 Jun;59(6):641-7.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.59.6.641.
    6.    Kessler RC, Foster CL, Saunders WB, Stang PE. Social consequences of psychiatric disorders, I: educational attainment. Am J Psychiatry 1995 Jul;152(7):1026-32.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.152.7.1026.
    7.    Kessler RC, McLaughlin KA, Green JG, et al. Childhood adversities and adult psychopathology in the WHO World Mental Health Surveys. Br J Psychiatry 2010 Nov;197(5):378-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.110.080499.
    8.    Breslau J, Lane M, Sampson N, Kessler RC. Mental disorders and subsequent educational attainment in a US national sample. J Psychiatr Res 2008 Jul;42(9):
708-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2008.01.016.
    9.    Lorant V, Deliège D, Eaton W, Robert A, Philippot P, Ansseau M. Socioeconomic inequalities in depression: a meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol 2003 Jan 15;157(2):
98-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwf182.
    10.    Muntaner C, Eaton WW, Miech R, O’Campo P. Socioeconomic position and major mental disorders. Epidemiol Rev 2004;26:53-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/
epirev/mxh001.
    11.    Brownhill S, Wilhelm K, Barclay L, Schmied V. ‘Big build’: hidden depression in
men. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2005 Oct;39(10):921-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1614.2005.01665.x.
    12.    Oquendo MA, Ellis SP, Greenwald S, Malone KM, Weissman MM, Mann JJ. Ethnic and sex differences in suicide rates relative to major depression in the United States. Am J Psychiatry 2001 Oct;158(10):1652-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.158.10.1652.
    13.    Joe S. Explaining changes in the patterns of black suicide in the United States from 1981 to 2002: an age, cohort, and period analysis. J Black Psychol 2006 Aug 1;32(3):262-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798406290465.
    14.    Katon W, Lin EH, Von Korff M, et al. Integrating depression and chronic disease care among patients with diabetes and/or coronary heart disease: the design of the TEAMcare study. Contemp Clin Trials 2010 Jul;31(4):312-22. DOI: https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.cct.2010.03.009.
    15.    Mezuk B, Eaton WW, Albrecht S, Golden SH. Depression and type 2 diabetes over
the lifespan: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Care 2008 Dec;31(12):2383-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2337/dc08-0985.
    16.    Carney RM, Freedland KE, Sheps DS. Depression is a risk factor for mortality in coronary heart disease. Psychosom Med 2004 Nov-Dec;66(6):799-801. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.psy.0000146795.38162.b1.
    17.    Katon W, Russo J, Lin EH, et al. Diabetes and poor disease control: is comorbid depression associated with poor medication adherence or lack of treatment intensification? Psychosom Med 2009 Nov;71(9):965-72. DOI: https://doi.org/
10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181bd8f55.
    18.    Katon WJ, Lin EH, Von Korff M, et al. Collaborative care for patients with depression and chronic illnesses. N Engl J Med 2010 Dec 30;363(27):2611-20. DOI: http://
dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1003955.
    19.    The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010. Public Law 111-148, 111th Congress, 124 Stat 119, HR 3590, enacted 2010 Mar 23.
    20.    Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008. Public Law 110-460, 110th Congress, HR 6983, enacted 2008 Oct 3.
    21.    Unützer J, Schoenbaum M, Druss BG, Katon WJ. Transforming mental health care at the interface with general medicine: report for the presidents commission. Psychiatr Serv 2006 Jan;57(1):37-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.57.1.37.
    22.    US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for depression: recommendations and rationale. Ann Intern Med 2002 May 21;136(10):760-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-136-10-200205210-00012.
    23.    Kroenke K, Strine TW, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Berry JT, Mokdad AH. The PHQ-8 as a measure of current depression in the general population. J Affect Disord 2009 Apr;114(1-3):163-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2008.06.026.
    24.    Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The Patient Health Questionnaire-2: validity
of a two-item depression screener. Med Care 2003 Nov;41(11):1284-92. DOI:
https://doi.org/010.1097/01.MLR.0000093487.78664.3C.
    25.    Whooley MA, Avins AL, Miranda J, Browner WS. Case-finding instruments for depression. Two questions are as good as many. J Gen Intern Med 1997 Jul;12(7):439-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.00076.x.
    26.    Ross CE, Mirowsky J. Socially-desirable response and acquiescence in a cross-cultural survey of mental health. J Health Soc Behav 1984 Jun;25(2):189-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2136668.
    27.    Groves RM, Fowler FJ Jr, Couper MP, Lepkowski JM, Singer E, Tourangeau R. Survey methodolgy. 1st ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2004.
    28.    Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Racial/ethnic differences in mental health service use among adults. HHS publication no. SMA-15-4906 [Internet]. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2015 [cited 2015 Oct 28]. Available from: www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/MHServicesUseAmongAdults/MHServicesUseAmongAdults.pdf.
    29.    Wang PS, Berglund P, Kessler RC. Recent care of common mental disorders in the United States: prevalence and conformance with evidence-based recommendations. J Gen Intern Med 2000 May;15(5):284-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.
2000.9908044.x.
    30.    González HM, Vega WA, Williams DR, Tarraf W, West BT, Neighbors HW. Depression care in the United States: too little for too few. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2010 Jan;67(1):37-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.168.
    31.    Office of the Surgeon General; Center for Mental Health Service; National Institute of Mental Health. Mental health: culture, race, and ethnicity: executive summary. A supplement to mental health: a report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2001.
    32.    Hudson DL, Karter AJ, Fernandez A, et al. Differences in the clinical recognition of depression in diabetes patients: the Diabetes Study of Northern California (DISTANCE). Am J Manag Care 2013 May;19(5):344-52.
 

The Permanente Journal

Sponsored by the eight Permanente Medical Groups, The Permanente Journal advances knowledge in scientific research, clinical medicine, and innovative health care delivery.

Reprint Permissions

The Permanente Journal welcomes requests for reprints and reproduction. Use of any and all material published in The Permanente Journal is copyrighted and protected.

The Permanente Press

The Permanente Press publishes The Permanente Journal and books related to healthcare. Journal subscriptions are entered for the calendar year. Advance payment in US dollars is required.


ISSN 1552-5775 Copyright © 2018 thepermanentejournal.org.

The Permanente Press. All Rights Reserved.