Agents for Change: Nonphysician Medical Providers and Health Care Quality

Agents for Change: Nonphysician Medical Providers and Health Care Quality

Nathan A Boucher, PA-C, MS, MPA, CPHQ; Marvin A McMillen, MD, FACS, MACP; James S Gould, PA-C, MS

Perm J 2015 Winter; 19(1):90-93 [Full Citation]

https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/14-095

Abstract

Quality medical care is a clinical and public health imperative, but defining quality and achieving improved, measureable outcomes are extremely complex challenges. Adherence to best practice invariably improves outcomes. Nonphysician medical providers (NPMPs), such as physician assistants and advanced practice nurses (eg, nurse practitioners, advanced practice registered nurses, certified registered nurse anesthetists, and certified nurse midwives), may be the first caregivers to encounter the patient and can act as agents for change for an organization's quality-improvement mandate. NPMPs are well positioned to both initiate and ensure optimal adherence to best practices and care processes from the moment of initial contact because they have robust clinical training and are integral to trainee/staff education and the timely delivery of care. The health care quality aspects that the practicing NPMP can affect are objective, appreciative, and perceptive. As bedside practitioners and participants in the administrative and team process, NPMPs can fine-tune care delivery, avoiding the problem areas defined by the Institute of Medicine: misuse, overuse, and underuse of care. This commentary explores how NPMPs can affect quality by 1) supporting best practices through the promotion of guidelines and protocols, and 2) playing active, if not leadership, roles in patient engagement and organizational quality-improvement efforts.

Introduction

A prospective physician assistant (PA) student applicant explains to the admissions committee that s/he would like to become a PA rather than a physician because s/he "wouldn't have to worry so much about the administrative aspects of health care and could spend more time taking care of patients." Although this patient-centered sentiment may be noble, it is a misconception of modern nonphysician medical provider (NPMP) practice, including the roles of PAs, nurse practitioners, advanced practice registered nurses, certified nurse midwives, and certified registered nurse anesthetists. NPMPs, along with all other members of a patient's health care team, are increasingly asked to take on administrative and quality aspects of health care delivery that once were the sole concerns of supervising physicians or administrators. NPMPs can and should play a major role in shaping health care quality and outcomes.1 These medical providers can do so readily by educating staff, promoting adherence to clinical guidelines and protocols, playing active roles in quality-related decision-making processes for their organizations, and leading patient-engagement efforts aimed at quality improvement. NPMPs are especially appropriate members of the health care team to strengthen and uphold best practices owing to their advanced knowledge base2-4 and to their role in enhancing physician trainees' education.5,6 Furthermore, their training model and scope of practice are most often based on a collaborative approach to care, a paradigm of value in health care,7 and they often are able to expand the amount of care offered by a physician or medical service.8 The new paradigm may be that quality is everyone's business—all staff at all hours—and NPMPs can be an effective agent for change in many settings owing to their training and highly visible role in health care delivery.9

Health care quality improvement (QI) is a concern in many settings: outpatient and inpatient care; for individual patients and for public health; and in the context of specific illnesses, disciplines, product lines, and institutions. At the federal level, there has been a recent surge of support for improving health outcomes and patient satisfaction and allocating resources accordingly. As part of the 2009 economic stimulus package, the federal government dedicated $1.1 billion to study the effectiveness of medical modalities in curbing costs and improving quality for health consumers.10 Action steps aimed at improving quality in health care require shifts in an organization's culture and in health care workers' attitudes and a reworking of roles and processes.11-13 Mandates for QI now come from health reform legislation14 and professional certification bodies,15 and marketing influenced by consumer opinion has an impact as well.16 The PA maintenance of certification process, for example, now requires demonstration of participation in quality- and performance-improvement projects as well as continuing education credits during the ten-year recertification cycle.15 The emphasis on defining and improving health care quality delivered by the fractionated American system of care has increased the pressure on those very fractions to alter practices and communications to improve patient outcomes. This is congruent with many aspects of the unfolding health reform measures mandated by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.17

Why are NPMPs of particular interest? As the population ages, there will be an increased need for medical practitioners. The Bureau of Labor Statistics projects 38% growth in the number of PAs and 31% growth in the number of nurse practitioners, certified nurse midwives, and certified registered nurse anesthetists for 2012-2022.18 These NPMPs diagnose conditions and counsel and treat many patients in many settings, including primary care and acute care settings, and the results are usually comparable to physicians and include high rates of patient satisfaction.19-21 Furthermore, the PA-physician practice model, for example, stipulates that a team approach be used when caring for patients. This model maintains clinical service stability and promotes optimal outcomes for patients.22 This practice architecture, coupled with growing support and utilization of collaborative care using interprofessional communication and practice models, can help to optimize the delivery of care.23-25

In Crossing the Quality Chasm, the Institute of Medicine emphasizes three problem clusters in the delivery of health care: misuse, overuse, and underuse of care.12 These problems can be avoided by gaining knowledge of and adhering to evidence-based clinical care guidelines (or consensus statements) published by authoritative, professional medical bodies26,27 and by using evidence-based clinical care protocols for select processes.28,29 Despite the national emphasis on the importance of clinical guidelines, adherence to guidelines in medical practice is often poor.30 Practicing physicians require extensive medical knowledge, but they may lack awareness of or be unfamiliar with the most recent guidelines or other evidence-based practices.31 This is an opportunity for NPMPs to add value to a medical practice or hospital service. They are well trained in the basic and clinical sciences and can play a key role in guiding health care staff in adherence to the most recent and relevant developments in evidence-based care. For example, they can thoroughly understand recent guidelines for target blood glucose levels in acute care settings, teach them to relevant staff, and oversee the monitoring. This adherence, driven by the NPMP, can be the cornerstone of a service's or practice's success in maintaining acceptable patient outcomes.22 Table 1 illustrates the triple C approach to optimal dissemination of clinical care guidelines and protocols using the NPMP as the change agent.

Nonphysician Medical Providers Can Affect Quality of Care

Health care quality can be assessed as objective, appreciative, and perceptive,32 and NPMPs can affect these quality aspects in positive ways. Figure 1 details three ways NPMPs can play active roles that affect the three aspects of quality. Objective quality has historically been the province of those working in the QI Department or administrators of a health care organization. External regulatory standards (eg, those set by the Joint Commission or the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) or established internal criteria set by the health care organization itself steer objective quality goals. Examples of quality goals can be found in documentation by the Surgical Care Improvement Project33 and the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems,34 and they are tied to reimbursement structures for health care services. NPMPs' active role in continually educating and updating other health care staff on developments in evidence-based practices can critically affect patient health outcomes (Table 1).

Appreciative quality is judged by colleagues and peers working in a similar setting. NPMPs can affect this aspect of quality by serving actively, even in leadership capacities, on organizational quality committees. Appreciative quality is less quantitative and more subjective (ie, opinion based on experience), but it may affect referral to providers and health care organizations.35 For example, a provider or organization that is known to provide exemplary care in concert with best practices is likely to have the opportunity to care for more patients, because more patients will be referred to them. In contrast, poor processes or outcomes, as judged by others in the same or a similar field, can be detrimental to reputation and revenue. Reputation and revenue are major considerations for any health care organization or provider delivering care under both for-profit and not-for-profit business models. Achieving good patient outcomes and discharging satisfied patients to the community is the best way to manage external appreciation of organizational quality. Internally, an organization can also enact a peer-satisfaction review process.36 By assuming membership and leadership on an organization's quality-related committees, NPMPs will be at the table to represent their respective services, disciplines, and practices. Their perspective is not always appreciated in health care operations, but their involvement has been shown to enhance care processes.37 Furthermore, such collaboration in organizational quality initiatives can also affect objective quality concerns.

The idiom "Vote with your feet" illustrates perceptive quality, an aspect of quality with a role for NPMPs
(Figure 1). Patients and family members, when not satisfied with their health care or provider, may have the option of switching providers. Patients often have strong opinions about the care they receive, and these opinions are not always based on objective data (eg, Was the treatment effective?). How patients feel the care was delivered may be just as important as the treatment's effectiveness from a customer service standpoint. In customer service industries—including health care—satisfied customers tell others, but dissatisfied customers tell many more. Dissatisfaction is communicated both informally, such as telling a friend or neighbor, and formally, via health consumer surveys by the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems, for example.34 Therefore, leadership in patient engagement is an important potential role for NPMPs. The history of the NPMP as patient advocate, when coupled with the QI mandate, highlights the ideal role of the NPMP in patient engagement.38,39

Quality issues must be investigated, including patient or family interviews, with professionalism, attention to detail, advanced medical knowledge, and organizational awareness. A useful technique employed by one of the authors (NAB) is a brief quality conversation (Figure 1) with patients or families, where the focus is on assessing satisfaction with current care and determining what manageable solutions might be offered. If patients and families experience active engagement directed at ongoing QI, they feel attended to—even if some problems do not have an immediate solution. Sometimes answers to questions are less important than the patient's and family's perception that caregivers took the time to listen attentively.40

Agents for Change: Nonphysician Medical Providers and Health Care Quality

Quality in Care Delivery: A Good Habit

NPMPs can play an active leadership role in QI in their organization. NPMPs are critical decision makers at the bedside, but they may also be called upon to share the helm with administrators and quality professionals working on the big picture of a practice or organization's care delivery processes.41,42 NPMPs must make sure they seek a place at the table where decisions are being made, as they have the insight and training to effect meaningful changes in patient care. As lifelong learners, NPMPs have opportunities to develop skills to participate in QI and organizational change that enhance patients' clinical outcomes and improve that which is more subjective but equally important: patient satisfaction. NPMPs can place themselves and their organizations on the map by identifying suboptimal aspects of care with regard to the three quality aspects discussed above (Figure 1).

Aristotle is credited as the first to say, "Excellence is not an act, but a habit." Repeated acts create habit. In their repeated patient encounters, NPMPs have an enormous opportunity to think critically about actions they can take personally and changes that can be made within their health care organizations to optimize delivery of care to patients. NPMPs' appreciation of the bedside process of care may give them insights into analysis and corrective actions that less-clinically intimate administrators may lack. Health care administrators and physician leaders are encouraged to harness the skills and experience of NPMPs, who can act as agents of change for health care QI and patient safety.

Agents for Change: Nonphysician Medical Providers and Health Care Quality

Disclosure Statement

The author(s) have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Acknowledgment

Leslie Parker, ELS, provided editorial assistance.

References

   1.  Footracer KG, Essary AC, McNellis R, Schuer KM. Health care: the quality chasm 10 years later. JAAPA 2012 Mar;25(3):20-1.

   2.  Furlong E, Smith R. Advanced nursing practice: policy, education and role development. J Clin Nurs 2005 Oct;14(9):1059-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01220.x.

   3.  Glicken AD. Excellence in physician assistant training through faculty development. Acad Med 2008 Nov;83(11):1107-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181890aa0.

   4.  O'Sullivan CT, Thompson ES. Economics and the education of nurse anesthetists: part 1. AANA J 2004 Oct;72(5):329-32.

   5.  Buch KE, Genovese MY, Conigliaro JL, et al. Non-physician practitioners' overall enhancement to a surgical resident's experience. J Surg Educ 2008 Jan-Feb;65(1):50-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2007.07.002.

   6.  Joffe AM, Pastores SM, Maerz LL, Mathur P, Lisco SJ. Utilization and impact on fellowship training of non-physician advanced practice providers in intensive care units of academic medical centers: a survey of critical care program directors. J Crit Care 2014 Feb;29(1):112-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.10.005.

   7.  Fletcher GF, Berra K, Fletcher BJ, Gilstrap L, Wood MJ. The integrated team approach to the care of the patient with cardiovascular disease. Curr Probl Cardiol 2012 Sep;37(9):369-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2012.04.001.

   8.  Morgan PA, Abbott DH, McNeil RB, Fisher DA. Characteristics of primary care office visits to nurse practitioners, physician assistants and physicians in United States Veterans Health Administration facilities, 2005 to 2010: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis. Hum Resour Health 2012 Nov 13;10(1):42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-10-42.

   9.  Yarnall KS, Østbye T, Krause KM, Pollak KI, Gradison M, Michener JL. Family physicians as team leaders: "time" to share the care. Prev Chronic Dis 2009 Apr;6(2):A59.

  10.  American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Pub L No. 111-5, 123 Stat 115 (Feb 17, 2009).

  11.  Kash BA, Spaulding A, Johnson CE, Gamm L. Success factors for strategic change initiatives: a qualitative study of healthcare administrators' perspectives. J Healthc Manag 2014 Jan-Feb;59(1):65-81.

  12.  Committee on the Quality of Healthcare in America, Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001 Mar 1.

  13.  Lukas CV, Holmes SK, Cohen AB, et al. Transformational change in health care systems: an organizational model. Health Care Manage Rev 2007 Oct-Dec;32(4):309-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.HMR.0000296785.29718.5d.

  14.  Hoo E, Lansky D, Roski J, Simpson L. Health plan quality improvement strategy reporting under the Affordable Care Act: implementation considerations [Internet]. New York, NY: The Commonwealth Fund; 2012 Apr 6 [cited 2014 Jun 30]. Available from: www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/fund-reports/2012/apr/health-plan-quality-improvement-strategy.

  15.  Certification maintenance [Internet]. Johns Creek, GA: National Commission on Certification of Physician Assistants; c2014 [cited 2014 Jul 8]. Available from: www.nccpa.net/CertMain.

  16.  Hibbard JH, Stockard J, Tusler M. Hospital performance reports: impact on quality, market share, and reputation. Health Aff (Millwood) 2005 Jul-Aug;24(4):1150-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.24.4.1150.

  17.  Kocher R, Emanuel EJ, DeParle NA. The Affordable Care Act and the future of clinical medicine: the opportunities and challenges. Ann Intern Med 2010 Oct 19;153(8):536-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-153-8-201010190-00274.

  18.  Nurse anesthetists, nurse midwives, and nurse practitioners [Internet]. Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics, United States Department of Labor; 2014 Jan 8 [cited 2014 Jun 30]. Available from: www.bls.gov/ooh/healthcare/nurse-anesthetists-nurse-midwives-and-nurse-practitioners.htm.

  19.  Moote M, Krsek C, Kleinpell R, Todd B. Physician assistant and nurse practitioner utilization in academic medical centers. Am J Med Qual. 2011 Nov-Dec;26(6):452-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1062860611402984.

  20.  Lohr RH, West CP, Beliveau M, et al. Comparison of the quality of patient referrals from physicians, physician assistants, and nurse practitioners. Mayo Clin Proc 2013 Nov;88(11):1266-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.08.013.

  21.  Everett C, Thorpe C, Palta M, Carayon P, Bartels C, Smith MA. Physician assistants and nurse practitioners perform effective roles on teams caring for Medicare patients with diabetes. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013 Nov;32(11):1942-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0506.

  22.  McMillen MA, Boucher N, Keith D, Gould DS, Gave A, Hoffman D. Maintaining quality of care 24/7 in a nontrauma surgical intensive care unit. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2012 Jul;73(1):202-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31824ba4bf.

  23.  Wu RC, Lo V, Rossos P, et al. Improving hospital care and collaborative communications for the 21st century: key recommendations for general internal medicine. Interact J Med Res 2012 Sep 24;1(2):e9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/ijmr.2022.

  24.  Olenick M, Allen LR. Faculty intent to engage in interprofessional education. J Multidiscip Healthc 2013 Apr 19;6:149-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S38499.

  25.  Bridges DR, Davidson RA, Odegard PS, Maki IV, Tomkowiak J. Interprofessional collaboration: three best practice models of interprofessional education. Med Educ Online 2011 Apr 8;16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v16i0.6035.

  26.  Lewis SZ, Diekemper R, Ornelas J, Casey KR. Methodologies for the development of CHEST guidelines and expert panel reports. Chest 2014 Jul;146(1):182-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.14-0824.

  27.  Franco G, Biagio F, Battista ZG, et al; ALERT-HF Investigators. ALERT-HF: adherence to guidelines in the treatment of patients with chronic heart failure. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2014 Jun;15(6):491-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2459/JCM.0000000000000038.

  28.  Grawey AE, Marinelli KA, Holmes AV; Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine. ABM Clinical Protocol #14: Breastfeeding-friendly physician's office: optimizing care for infants and children. Breastfeed Med 2013 Apr;8:237-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2013.9994.

  29.  Toback SL. Medical emergency preparedness in office practice. Am Fam Physician 2007 Jun;75(11):1679-84.

  30.  Pronovost PJ. Enhancing physicians' use of clinical guidelines. JAMA 2013 Dec 18;310(23):2501-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281334.

  31.  Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, et al. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 1999 Oct 20;282(15):1458-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.282.15.1458.

  32.  Ismail A. Regulatory requirements for healthcare systems [Internet]. [cited 2014 Sept 29]. Available from: http://gunston.gmu.edu/healthscience/547/Overview.asp.

  33.  Surgical Care Improvement Project [Internet]. Oak Brook, IL: The Joint Commission; 2014 Jun 23 [cited 2014 Jun 29]. Available from: www.jointcommission.org/surgical_care_improvement_project/.

  34.  Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems database [Internet]. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; c2014 [cited 2014 Jul 9]. Available from: https://cahps.ahrq.gov/cahps-database/index.html.

  35.  Klass D. Assessing doctors at work—progress and challenges. N Engl J Med 2007 Jan 25;356(4):414-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMe068212.

  36.  Chan LS, Elabiad M, Zheng L, et al. A medical staff peer review system in a public teaching hospital—an internal quality improvement tool. J Healthc Qual 2014 Jan-Feb;36(1):37-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1945-1474.2012.00208.x.

  37.  Wensing M, Wollersheim H, Grol R. Organizational interventions to implement improvements in patient care: a structured review of reviews. Implement Sci 2006 Feb 22;1:2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-1-2.

  38.  Newland J. Advocate for children's health. Nurse Pract 2007 Mar;32(3):7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NPR.0000263073.04074.f7.

  39.  Winegardner MF. Physician assistant: patient advocate. JAAPA 2004 Feb;17(2):55-6.

  40.  Bynum W. Why physicians need to be more than automated medical kiosks. Acad Med 2014 Feb;89(2):212-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000092.

  41.  Cawley JF, Ritsema TS, Brown D, et al. Assessing the value of dual physician assistant/public health degrees. J Physician Assist Educ 2011;22(3):23-8.

  42.  Dwyer D. Experiences of registered nurses as managers and leaders in residential aged care facilities: a systematic review. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2011 Dec;9(4):388-402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1609.2011.00239.x.

The Permanente Journal

Sponsored by the eight Permanente Medical Groups, The Permanente Journal advances knowledge in scientific research, clinical medicine, and innovative health care delivery.

Reprint Permissions

The Permanente Journal welcomes requests for reprints and reproduction. Use of any and all material published in The Permanente Journal is copyrighted and protected.

The Permanente Press

The Permanente Press publishes The Permanente Journal and books related to healthcare. Journal subscriptions are entered for the calendar year. Advance payment in US dollars is required.


ISSN 1552-5775 Copyright © 2018 thepermanentejournal.org.

The Permanente Press. All Rights Reserved.