Dealing With Change: Using the Conditional Change Model for Clinical Research

Dealing With Change: Using the Conditional Change Model for Clinical Research


Mikel Aickin, PhD

Spring 2009 - Volume 13 Number 2


Virtually all clinical medicine is about change. The criteria for deciding whether a therapy has been successful nearly always include consideration of the degree to which the patient’s initial condition has improved or to which a deteriorating condition has been stabilized. Both criteria depend on change. In the first case it is a rise in some measurement of benefit or drop in some measurement of burden, whereas in the second it is that a downward change has been prevented.

In clinical research, therefore, one of the most frequently used approaches is to compare changes in a treated group with corresponding changes in a control group. Perhaps the most notable pedagogic failing of statistics courses and textbooks is that they do not present the appropriate way to analyze data coming from this design, which explains why published analyses are so often suboptimal, if not actually incorrect. The purposes of this article are to explain what should be the default method of analyzing change data and to indicate how to compute and display the results graphically.


The Kaiser Permanente National CME Program designates this journal-based CME activity for 4 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.


27,000 print readers per quarter, 15,350 eTOC readers, and in 2018, 2 million page views of TPJ articles in PubMed from a broad international readership.

The Permanente Press

The Permanente Press publishes The Permanente Journal and books related to healthcare. For information about subscriptions, missing issues, billing, subscription renewal, and back issues, Email:

ISSN 1552-5775 Copyright © 2019

All Rights Reserved.