A Next Step: Reviewer Feedback on Quality Improvement Publication Guidelines

A Next Step: Reviewer Feedback on Quality Improvement Publication Guidelines


Tom Janisse, MD

Winter 2007 - Volume 11 Number 1

https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/06-152

Technology and Process Improvement

Dazzled by advances in surgical lasers, the anti-aging drug reservatrol, or Google's warp-speed search of the earth's information on their handheld computers, physicians and nurses may dismiss the significance of their recent diabetic and cardiac quality improvement (QI) work that arguably improves health care more than many technologic advances. Despite the intensity of designing and enacting QI studies to improve the processes, reliability, and safety of medical care, doctors and nurses have historically not captured or reported their data and findings with enough systematic rigor to turn your head from the brilliance of technology or the randomized, controlled, drug trials reported online and in the media even before print publication. Their work, however, is critical because embedding and integrating new knowledge into clinical practice through quality improvement work is ultimately the outcome that will improve the state of this country's health care.

The Permanente Journal

Sponsored by the eight Permanente Medical Groups, The Permanente Journal advances knowledge in scientific research, clinical medicine, and innovative health care delivery.

Reprint Permissions

The Permanente Journal welcomes requests for reprints and reproduction. Use of any and all material published in The Permanente Journal is copyrighted and protected.

The Permanente Press

A peer-reviewed journal of medical science, social science in medicine, and medical humanities, The Permanente Journal (ISSN 1552-5767) is published quarterly by The Permanente Press.


ISSN 1552-5775 Copyright © 2018 thepermanentejournal.org.

The Permanente Press. All Rights Reserved.