Team Disputes at End-of-Life: Toward an Ethic of Collaboration

Team Disputes at End-of-Life: Toward an Ethic of Collaboration


Debra Gerardi, RN, MPH, JD

Fall 2006 - Volume 10 Number 3

https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/06-030

Team Disputes at End of Life

There are persistent calls for improving end-of-life care in the United States. Several recurrent issues make end-of-life care suboptimal, including disputes among members of the health care team. Difficulties in end-of-life care arise around issues such as: variability in practice, poor communication among providers, lack of consensus regarding plan of care, incomplete documentation, and differences of opinion regarding the definition of futility. Despite documented support for improved collaboration among health care providers, the struggle to work together continues, often to the detriment of patients and their families, and more profoundly to the caregivers.

etoc emailClick here to join the eTOC list or text TPJ to 22828. You will receive an Email notice with the Table of Contents of each issue.

The Permanente Journal advances knowledge in scientific research, clinical medicine and innovative health care delivery. It is a peer-reviewed journal of medical science, social science in medicine, and medical humanities.

The Permanente Press

The Permanente Press publishes The Permanente Journal and books related to health care. For information about subscriptions, missing issues, billing, subscription renewal, and back issues, Email: permanente.journal@kp.org.

Circulation

27,000 print readers per quarter, 15,350 eTOC readers, and in 2018, 2 million page views of TPJ articles in PubMed from a broad international readership.

CME

The Kaiser Permanente National CME Program designates this journal-based CME activity for 4 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.


ISSN 1552-5767 Copyright © 2019 thepermanentejournal.org.

All Rights Reserved.