Minilaparotomy: A Minimally Invasive Alternative for Major Gynecologic Abdominal Surgery

Minilaparotomy: A Minimally Invasive Alternative for Major Gynecologic Abdominal Surgery


Mark H Glasser, MD

Winter 2005 - Volume 9 Number 1

https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/04-107

Introduction

In the 1960s or 1970s, gynecology residency training emphasized vaginal hysterectomy as the preferred technique for treating many conditions now managed by less invasive alternatives. This led gynecologists to become very skilled at operating through very small incisions. More recently, as these less invasive procedures are rapidly becoming the standard of care, and women are having fewer babies, vaginal surgery is performed less often. Because our young colleagues are acquiring less experience with this technique, the skill of operating through a very small incision is becoming a lost art. Of the 600,000 hysterectomies done in the United States each year--a number which has remained stable for the past 20 years--65% to 75% are done through large abdominal incisions.1 Rates in the Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) Region are somewhat better: The rate of abdominal hysterectomy is 68%, the rate of vaginal hysterectomy is 21%, and 11% of these procedures are done laparoscopically.

Winter 2005 Cover

The Permanente Journal

Sponsored by the eight Permanente Medical Groups, The Permanente Journal advances knowledge in scientific research, clinical medicine, and innovative health care delivery.

Reprint Permissions

The Permanente Journal welcomes requests for reprints and reproduction. Use of any and all material published in The Permanente Journal is copyrighted and protected.

The Permanente Press

A peer-reviewed journal of medical science, social science in medicine, and medical humanities, The Permanente Journal (ISSN 1552-5767) is published quarterly by The Permanente Press.


ISSN 1552-5775 Copyright © 2018 thepermanentejournal.org.

The Permanente Press. All Rights Reserved.