Minilaparotomy: A Minimally Invasive Alternative for Major Gynecologic Abdominal Surgery

Minilaparotomy: A Minimally Invasive Alternative for Major Gynecologic Abdominal Surgery


Mark H Glasser, MD

Winter 2005 - Volume 9 Number 1

http://dx.doi.org/10.7812/TPP/04-107

Introduction

In the 1960s or 1970s, gynecology residency training emphasized vaginal hysterectomy as the preferred technique for treating many conditions now managed by less invasive alternatives. This led gynecologists to become very skilled at operating through very small incisions. More recently, as these less invasive procedures are rapidly becoming the standard of care, and women are having fewer babies, vaginal surgery is performed less often. Because our young colleagues are acquiring less experience with this technique, the skill of operating through a very small incision is becoming a lost art. Of the 600,000 hysterectomies done in the United States each year--a number which has remained stable for the past 20 years--65% to 75% are done through large abdominal incisions.1 Rates in the Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) Region are somewhat better: The rate of abdominal hysterectomy is 68%, the rate of vaginal hysterectomy is 21%, and 11% of these procedures are done laparoscopically.

Circulation

25,000 print readers per quarter, 6900 eTOC readers, and in 2015, 1.4 million page views on TPJ articles in PubMed from a broad international readership

Subscriptions

The Permanente Journal (ISSN 1552-5767) is published quarterly by The Permanente Press. The Permanente Journal is available online (ISSN 1552-5775) at www.thepermanentejournal.org.

Letters

Articles, editorials, letters to the editor, and other material represent the opinion of the authors. Send your comments to permanente.journal@kp.org.


Copyright 2016 The Permanente Journal - Kaiser Permanente. All Rights Reserved.